Home
Site Map
Resources
Contact Us
Search
    
     
   
Home  
Unit - Index
Cultural Traits
Culture and Social Adjustment
Culture and Biological Adjustment
Xenocentrism
Subject Matter of Sociology
C.Wright Mills Power Elite
Education And Social Change
Social Mobility
Problems of Objectivity
Sociology As Science
Sociology & Economics Comparison
Importance of Hypothesis
Latent And Manifest Functions
Social Facts
Regionalism
Changing Structure of Family
Talcott Parsons Concept
Role Conflict and Its Resolution
Sociology and Political Science
Emergence of Classes in Tribes
Social Research
Class - Struggle of Karl Marx
Religious Fundamentalism
Emergence of Dalit Consciousness
Social Consequences
Social Movement and Social Change
Social Determinants
Integration of Tribes in Hindu Culture
Caste Associations
Functional Theory of Stratification
Types of Mobility
Sanskritization
Sacred and Profane
Religion and Science
Educational Inequalities in India
Theory and Fact
Primary Group and Reference Group
Ideal Type
Social Control
Protestant Ethic
Pattern Variables
Anomie
Types of Exchange
Malinowski’s Concept of Culture
Dysfunctions of Bureaucracy
Voluntaristic Theory of Action
Rationalization

Home >> Socio Short Notes >> Functional Theory of Stratification

Functional Theory of Stratification

The functionalists, Parsons and Kingsley Davis approach the problem of inequality from the perspective of society at large seeing it as a necessary feature of any properly functioning human society. According to Kingsley Davis social inequality is an unconsciously evolved device by which societies insure that the most important positions are conscientiously filled by the most qualified persons. Stratification arises basically out of the needs of societies not out of the needs or desires of individuals. The systems of stratification arise in response to two specific needs common to every human society.

First there is the need to instil in the abler members the motivation to occupy important and difficult positions which require greater than average ability .Second society must motivate such men once they are in these positions to perform the duties attached to them. Hence it must provide them with greater rewards. The two factors which are major determinants of the magnitude of the rewards attached to positions are their functional importance for the society and the relative scarcity of qualified personnel.

The system of stratification in any society is essentially an expression of the value system of that society. The rewards which men and positions enjoy are a function of the degree to which their qualities, performance and possessions measure up to the standards set by their society. Since men differ in these aspects, inequality is inevitable.