Home
Site Map
Resources
Contact Us
Search
    
     
   
Home  
Unit - Index
Cultural Traits
Culture and Social Adjustment
Culture and Biological Adjustment
Xenocentrism
Subject Matter of Sociology
C.Wright Mills Power Elite
Education And Social Change
Social Mobility
Problems of Objectivity
Sociology As Science
Sociology & Economics Comparison
Importance of Hypothesis
Latent And Manifest Functions
Social Facts
Regionalism
Changing Structure of Family
Talcott Parsons Concept
Role Conflict and Its Resolution
Sociology and Political Science
Emergence of Classes in Tribes
Social Research
Class - Struggle of Karl Marx
Religious Fundamentalism
Emergence of Dalit Consciousness
Social Consequences
Social Movement and Social Change
Social Determinants
Integration of Tribes in Hindu Culture
Caste Associations
Functional Theory of Stratification
Types of Mobility
Sanskritization
Sacred and Profane
Religion and Science
Educational Inequalities in India
Theory and Fact
Primary Group and Reference Group
Ideal Type
Social Control
Protestant Ethic
Pattern Variables
Anomie
Types of Exchange
Malinowski’s Concept of Culture
Dysfunctions of Bureaucracy
Voluntaristic Theory of Action
Rationalization

Home >> Socio Short Notes >> Malinowski’s Concept of Culture

Malinowski’s Concept of Culture

According to Malinowski culture is an instrument which enables man to secure his bio-psychic survival and subsequently a higher mental-intellectual survival. Since each aspect of a culture, whether it is economic organization or social organization or religion or language is rooted in the needs of the human being, they are all inter-related to each other through the common ground in which they are rooted i.e the human being with his needs. There is nothing loose within a culture; it is all inter-connected and no single trait has any meaning by itself unless it is seen in the context of the whole. Malinowski emphasised the self-sufficiency and the holistic character of a culture. He pointed out that if one aspect of a culture is changed the whole of it will change. He believed in cultural pluralism where every culture grows in response to localised versions of the bio-psychic needs of a people and that it is to be judged in terms of these and not in terms of any absolute values. Adequacy in terms of local needs is the characteristic of a well-integrated culture in the light of prevailing knowledge.