Home
Site Map
Resources
Contact Us
Search
    
     
   
Home  
Unit - Index
Cultural Traits
Culture and Social Adjustment
Culture and Biological Adjustment
Xenocentrism
Subject Matter of Sociology
C.Wright Mills Power Elite
Education And Social Change
Social Mobility
Problems of Objectivity
Sociology As Science
Sociology & Economics Comparison
Importance of Hypothesis
Latent And Manifest Functions
Social Facts
Regionalism
Changing Structure of Family
Talcott Parsons Concept
Role Conflict and Its Resolution
Sociology and Political Science
Emergence of Classes in Tribes
Social Research
Class - Struggle of Karl Marx
Religious Fundamentalism
Emergence of Dalit Consciousness
Social Consequences
Social Movement and Social Change
Social Determinants
Integration of Tribes in Hindu Culture
Caste Associations
Functional Theory of Stratification
Types of Mobility
Sanskritization
Sacred and Profane
Religion and Science
Educational Inequalities in India
Theory and Fact
Primary Group and Reference Group
Ideal Type
Social Control
Protestant Ethic
Pattern Variables
Anomie
Types of Exchange
Malinowski’s Concept of Culture
Dysfunctions of Bureaucracy
Voluntaristic Theory of Action
Rationalization

Home >> Socio Short Notes >> Problems of Objectivity in Sociological Research

Problems of Objectivity in Sociological Research

Sociology being a science aspires for the goal objectivity but it continues to be an elusive goal at the practical level. All research is guided by certain viewpoints which involve subjectivity. The ideological biases acquired in the course of education and training has a bearing on the choice of the topic of research. Subjectivity can also creep in at the time of formulation of hypotheses. All sociological theories are limited to particular groups whose viewpoints and interests they represent. Thus formulation of hypotheses will automatically introduce a bias in the sociological research. Another level at which subjectivity creeps in the course of research is that of collection of empirical data. No technique of data collection is perfect. In case of participant observation the observer acquires a bias in favour of the group he is studying. While in non-participant observation of the sociologist belongs to a different group than that under study he is likely to impose his values and prejudices. In all societies there are certain prejudices which affect the research studies. In case of interview as a technique the data may be influenced by context of the interview, the interaction of the participants, and participant's definition of the situation and if adequate rapport does not extend between them there might be communication barriers.